“ Was at the premiere. I hope that it deserves an "excellent" grade now. Some of the scenes seemed underreported. But in general, I like performances in the small hall for their intimacy and closeness to the actors.

“ I was bored. The costumes are good, the actors are good, but in total they didn't light up.

“ Some stereotyped plot moves did not allow me to score "excellent". The production itself is bright and spectacular.

“ I rarely laugh at Moliere. It seems outdated to me. And then I didn't have too much fun. Although the production is cute. And one more plus - I love chamber scenes, and this is a performance on the chamber stage

“ The quality of work of employees of the workshop of Peter Fomenko has fallen markedly. The performance is unsuccessful, everything is crumpled, inexpressive, hastily. The whole hall came to Polina Agureeva, but even she completely disappointed. Of course, you subconsciously compare with Ryazanov’s masterpiece, and nothing can be compared with him. evaluation of the performance not more than 3 out of 5.

“ Awesome finale! Neither Edmond nor Edward let us down, Goneril and Regan helped, played better than others could! Gloucester is also quite good, and everyone else liked me!

“ And great!

“ Shakespeare said that the fool is thin and young? The jester is fat, drunk and smart, his children and grandchildren are growing up, but he is joking about something

“ It did not seem that long, if you listen to Shakespeare, the time flies by quickly, but irreversibly

“ But in prose speaking, in the first act I heard almost nothing, I sat in the very middle of the 2 rows of the amphitheater. Something with acoustics? A lot of mechanics, squeaking, rail. And in the 2nd act, she cried, and listened, and admired, oh, how good the witches are! How beautiful everyone is! Thank!

“ Theater Fomenko - always amazing. However, "King Lear" seemed somehow "raw." Many unnecessary, fussy movements and unnecessary words and gestures. I was on Ulysses, 6 hours flew in a state of euphoria from the action, but here all the time some conceptual discrepancy caught. This is just an opinion. Badalov and Kolubkov - masters unsurpassed. The rest have learned their roles well.

“ The performance rather liked than not. Good performance, but Kamenkovich is still not Fomenko. In the acting plan, the “old guard” - Badalov, Kutepova, Kolubkov, many young actors are inexpressive, it is obviously early to play Shakespeare. In general, I recommend to those who can sit through a trt and a half hours

“ I was at the concert of Irina for the first time, although I have been a fan of her work for more than 2 years. And it turned out to be a great happiness for me to finally “get acquainted” with Irina live, listen to her speech, performance ... Moreover, the tickets turned out to be quite inexpensive. I was able to buy a ticket for 1000 rubles to the amphitheater and was very pleased. In the workshop of P.Fomenko even with my not 100% vision was clearly visible. From the concert only the warmest and bright feelings. This meeting was awesome. Many favorite songs were touched to tears ... And Irina herself was open to the public, performed amazingly, communicated with the audience. The program was also great. Thanks to all, thanks to whom I was at the appointed place at the appointed time. It was delicious.

“ Beautiful performance: elegant, subtle, ironic, in the style of "fomenok."

“ Loved it! As always, we enjoyed our visit to the workshop of P.Fomenko: an interesting interpretation of the work, talented actors, live music during the intermission, exceptionally polite theater workers.

“ Wonderful performance, watched with pleasure. Actors play is easy.

“ ,, Fantasy Faryatyeva "November 5, 2018. We were with her son for 20 years. She led him, hoping that there would be a deep tragic story, lost faith in love and understanding of a person, but still with a timid hope of happiness. the performer is an exact performance of the image (magnificent A. Mironov., Z. Sharko, M. Neyolova, L. Gritsenko and unmatched. E. Durov.). In the play there are probably director's finds and original decorations, but there is no integrity stories. Shurachka liked (P. Agureyev), the only bright role, gorgeous and Ganichna! The rest is not impressed. Finishing the heat and tightness of the hall

“ In the Snuffbox, Storm and Kinestone are not worse! I'm not talking about Vii!

“ I heard a lot of good reviews about this performance, but I do not believe in any of the reviews until I myself look. Looked. Miracle! Fairy tale in real life! Everything is perfect, both the production and the performance! One of the best performances I've seen in the last theatrical season. Many thanks to the creators and performers! I especially liked Irina Gorbacheva. Of the shortcomings; at the beginning of the first act something was wrong with acoustics, from the 2nd row of the amphitheater it was vaguely audible. Well, of course, the price of tickets! But there are boundaries to all!

“ Perfectly! What happiness, that finally gathered. The play is 17 years old, but does not look aged at all. Diva is given, as at first glance insignificant gestures and intonations convey the sensation of Moscow, Petersburg ... era. A real theater! Bravo!

“ Very good performance. The action is not prolonged, dynamic. A wonderful play of actors. There is a place of sadness and humor.

“ Very good setting

“ I will not say anything new about the performance. The sold out signs speak for themselves. Go and do not regret it. BUT! When buying a ticket, note that the balcony is not suitable for children under 10 years old. In particular, from the extreme places of row 1 of the balcony the child does not see the scene at all.

“ A stunning performance! I liked it very much! Thanks for a wonderful evening! The actors are gorgeous! BRAVO!!! I recommend to everyone!!! You will not regret!!!!

“ And I was bored at the play. Yes, the statement has a profound philosophical meaning, but neither the laughter of special, nor tears, in short, the emotions expected did not cause. Too tight. Did not like.

“ Not bad, although the excitement around this production is incomprehensible. The first third of the performance completely disliked, it was more interesting to look at the faces of the audience (most of the faces read "dear mother, and where I got ..."). Then they seemed to take a closer look - it was even interesting. That they went, in principle, did not regret, but only because tickets were offered by friends at face value. Register for years in the queue or buy from bribes for crazy money - perhaps this is for connoisseurs who are really versed on a professional level. For a simple viewer - rather put a daw, "I was there," at least according to the reaction of the bulk of this impression.

“ March 17 she enjoyed the performance together with her son (10 years). We received great pleasure. The play of actors, musical accompaniment, costumes, scenery - everything is perfect!

“ 10 out of 10. Great, great, great actors, favorite Tsyganov as always on top, looked 3 times, I recommend

“ Awful amateur performance, left in the intermission, the first time in this theater is such a disappointment.

“ A subtle and beautiful performance, a classic manner of performing, through pauses, movement and words. The aftertaste that always remains after Fomenko Workshop is worth it and how the drug is attracted there again and again!

“ I liked the lecture! I think that it was interesting, both for professionals and for people who love theater. Helps to look in a new light on the heroes of famous plays. Alexei Vadimovich infects the hall with his interest in the theater and this connects us sitting in the hall with the Renaissance tradition.

“ A wonderful performance, as always in this theater, very subtly played, thought out to the smallest detail! No tragedy, but it's no less profound. Many thanks to all artists!

“ For a year and a half chasing tickets. AND NOT EAR.

“ Was in this theater for the first time - a cozy, stylish theater house! I liked it very much! Maksakov, bravo! I really liked the game and the production. The plot did not like - small problems for the Russian people, irrelevant.

“ The performance is wonderful! Gypsies unexpected, Kutepova, as always, is beautiful! The scenery of the second part is so precise and piercing that there arises an aching sad feeling about a lost beautiful world. I leave every time with a heap of emotions, which I want to worry, think about, discuss for a long time!

“ She ran to this performance from the station, very tired and, moreover, fell under the rain and even was skeptical about the performance, although she wanted to get into the production for a long time. In the end - I forgot about everything and just enjoyed it. This is an amazing performance with thoughtful and built dialogues, language games. I thought about the questions that made my heart sometimes miss a few blows, and after hitting at an accelerated pace! "The actors are all - the artists of the unit!" It's not for nothing that this play was played not only by Fomenko, but also by Kim! Music, if I'm not mistaken, sounds Nikitin. Sixties. It's just a dream. So I'll be back! Not only for this production, but also for the theater itself.

“ Sumptuously! Very pleased!

“ Ulysses. Simply super! Watched a second time. And I will come again! THANK YOU!

“ I liked everything very much

“ For a 6-hour performance, wider and more comfortable chairs, coolers with water in the lobby and affordable food without queue at the buffet are needed.

“ I was delighted! A very difficult performance, but fantastically masterfully done - a low bow to all the masters of his craft

“ Just great!

“ A real theater! Excellent game and a subtle reading of Nabokov.

“ A stunning performance. I would never have thought that such a book could be placed in a 5-hour play! And so masterfully! The actors play is simply amazing! Do not be afraid, it will not be boring, it looks in one breath!

“ I liked everything very much

“ Beautiful production! I love her very much, I will come again.

“ I liked the performance of the actors, very expressive. Interesting scenery and created atmosphere. But of course with the storyline with a general idea, it did not work out. Probably it's not just a GIFT ....

“ I bow to actors who have mastered such complex monologues. Awesome actors play. The performance itself is hard to understand, especially one act, but in the end you realize that this is a performance about lonely people and each of the heroes is lonely in its own way.

“ Sumptuously! I liked the performance very much, I would like to note that I have sotrela the play before, now the actors' play is much better

“ A stunning performance, thank you!

“ The performance is dynamic, with a branded crank. In content, rather, for those "to whom for 40", although the young people in the hall reacted very positively.

“ Thank you! We really liked the actors' play, the production, but the material for us was difficult for perception. We spent the whole evening discussing what we saw, in general, I liked it!

“ There was a feeling that both the author and the director want to say something significant, but, like dogs, they can not. The play left feelings of bewilderment and awkwardness. Although a couple of interesting (and not more) moments were still very surprised by the screams bravo at the end.

“ The first act disappointed: too long, abstract, too "literary" and confused. The story of Fyodor and Zina's acquaintance is collapsed. The second act is much more scenic, and more lively. Successfully stressed the theme of the tragedy of emigration, the theme of creativity, the material for which is everything and which is most important for the hero, and the Jewish theme. But the very important part of the plot is too weak: the loss of the key. The viewer knows that the key left behind the locked door in the hallway of Marianne, but it escapes from him that Fate played with the heroes the next joke: and Fedor does not have a key and at the moment when the heroes finally can connect, the apartment will be inaccessible. Allusions to the production of the Theatrical Novel (half-dime-half-darkness on stage, pillars-scenery, the attack of ugly, frighteningly comical critics, the weariness of the author) The Three Sisters and After the Curtain (the station as a scene of action), but the Theatrical Novel And "Three Sisters" is more successful.

“ Very pleased!

“ Thank you! Wonderful statement. A special pleasure from the poems of Nabokov in the performance of actors.

“ I liked it very much. Congratulations on the successful premiere

“ A stunning performance

“ An interesting interpretation of the work. A good move with the introduction of a new hero-critic. Actors coped with the task, but did not have enough energy and sometimes emotions. Thanks for the production!

“ A good complex performance, but 4 hours is too much - or you need to start early)

“ Thanks to the creative team of the theater! I liked it very much. Multifaceted, whole, fresh, dynamic! I want to re-read a lot. Many interesting images and findings!

“ Shock! I really love your theater

“ Long, a lot of funny zadumok, but incomprehensible, although very high-quality, time does not recall anything

“ The performance is worthy. Not for nothing in his time, "Golden Mask" received. How to leaf through your life and country life. Still impressed.

“ Thanks for the pleasure of visiting the theater, I liked the performance

“ Thank you very much for the performance! Plunged into the atmosphere of Germany early 20 century. A perepevka critics is something! Bravo!

“ I got a big charge of energy from meeting with real, living art. Thanks for the aesthetic pleasure. I hope I can afford this joy again and again.

“ Good afternoon. Fate, era, time - our life for the year. Dreams and reality, hopes and disappointments, love and separation, victory and defeat - a simple human life. All this is so close that it can not but inspire! The play was very touched! Special thanks for the warmth and atmosphere of every action! The final scene picks up to tears!

“ Fantastic Polina Kutepova! And in general - actors in Fomenko always inspire and inspire, but here - especially. I did not read the book, so I can not say how straightforward the statement is in relation to Nabokov's text, but there are a lot of cool sets of scenographic pieces. As a result, 4 hours pass almost in one breath. Despite the fact that there is no content as such, or rather - it all comes down to the form, rather than to some storyline. In general, she did not regret at all. It's all in my unsophisticated amateur look, of course.

“ We really liked the performance.

“ Extremely weak performance. The text is either a set of stamps, or incoherent mumbling. Even good actors do not know what to play, so they do not save the performance. 80-ies the authors go as a list of the most well-known events - Vysotsky died, Joe Dasen died, Brezhnev, Andropov and Chernenko died. In short, all died and the Olympics. There is no regressure. It seems that the whole performance is some kind of a prelude, the action is about to begin, but it never began. It was necessary immediately to leave, sorry for the lost time and artists.

“ An unusual performance, but worth a look! All the first action - a chronicle of the history of our country since 1975, and for a single person - a summary of life ... Nostalgia! Memories of youth! The actors play well. It's nice to see Ekaterina Vasilyeva on stage.

“ It's good to see the performance, in which actors are laid out. For them, this is a difficult performance - a lot of text, everyone plays several roles at once. Emotional and physical load viewers simply do not notice. The play gives a feeling of a story that is born in your eyes - sad, cheerful, different. The corporate style of "fomenok": the theatrical convention is so convincing and real that there is a feeling of film truth or television effect of presence. And always a good hall - the third time I looked "Ulysses" and again thought about the magic of this amazing theater ... no-one and thinking!

“ Delight from the performance and from the theater! Thank you

“ Very touching performance with amazing scenography. Reading the novel, there is a feeling that all the experiences of the main character are very serious. In the play, the accents are shifted so that irony is everywhere, which makes the entire story told, perhaps, easier and less tragic. This was my first performance at the Fomenko Theater - a wonderful, memorable start!

“ Very good

“ Attended the premiere of the play, where the actor Evgeny Tsyganov made his debut as a director. The play by Olga Mukhina about the years of perestroika and to the present day seemed difficult for me to stage in the theater. What is called a gallop across Europe. And we were worried, worried about how Eugene will cope ... AND BRAVO and the director, and the actors, well done! The performance turned out! Catherine Vasilieva also worked for all the other actors! I wanted to see Eugene, but in the credits on our day he was not there, but it's a pity. But to bow at the end of the play he left, and it's nice! Olympus and I took place !?

“ Always considered your theater the best in the country

“ Thank you very much! I liked the performance very much, did not even notice how 4 hours passed!

“ Very very cool

“ Phenomenal performance! I experienced a great aesthetic pleasure! Everything is just perfect! Thank you so much!

“ Wow! It was cool! I liked it! I will advise this performance to all my friends and acquaintances!

“ A very complex work and a difficult performance! Have made the incredible, in my opinion - very interesting, as always with a great sense of humor and a bewitching game! I'm delighted! Thank you!

“ Fedor Malyshev - an actor of great talent, really liked his game!

“ Were on October 1st. I liked the performance very much. Thanks to the actors for the game, especially to E.Vasileva. Inimitable. I bow low! Health, creative success!

“ Great performance, thank you!

“ I liked it very much

“ Ltd!!! 6 hours of creative process, the whole life swept in one day! And I did not want that day to ever end ...

“ The husband, born in 1969, shed a couple of times, comparing the performance with his own memories. This is true. Many thanks.

“ Feedback is most positive!

“ The fact that Tsyganov is a good actor, I knew for a long time, but yesterday I was convinced that he was also an excellent director. Olympia is the history of one family for almost 40 years, from 1976 to the present day. This is certainly a benefit of the young actors of the theater - Ivan Vakulenko and Serafima Ogaryova, the other actors, even the magnificent Ekaterina Vasilyeva, only shade, albeit no less talently, the love story of Alesha and Larisa. At some moments, emotions could not be restrained, in some scenes a tear fell over her eyes, in some a smile appeared on her face. The religious motive spoils the whole picture a little, but such are the Russians, it's not wise to be saved from troubles, so let them) I got great pleasure, the main plus of the productions, that each generation will find there something of its own, and this "soviet" will undoubtedly unite to Final, so I would recommend a family trip to the theater. Thank you very much for Evgeny Tsyganov, his actors and all the creators of the performance for the pleasure they received!

“ Was at the play on Friday. A stunning performance. Still impressed. Bravo Evgeny Tsyganov.

“ This is my first time in this theater. The feeling of nonstandardness arose immediately. Architecture, the atmosphere, everything is "different", not the same as in other theaters. This continued on stage. We are used to classics. And this action forces to peel off the husks and zaskoruzlovosti, to brainwash and open the soul, in order to experience the game actors and ideas of the author. Interesting and pleasant finds from the director. For a long time I wanted to see Polina Kutepova alive. A wonderful acquaintance!

“ It was great, thank the theater)

“ Unfortunately, the performance is bad. He does not broadcast anything Nabokov, the characters are picked up surprisingly out of place. Pensive, intelligent Cherdyntsev from the book recalls in the play Kostya from the "Pokrovsky Gates". The atmosphere of life in the estate near St. Petersburg is not absolutely transferred. Family scenes resemble a farce. The father, almost the main character of the book after Cherdyntsev, looks ridiculous. A touching narrator with Gogol's nose is annoying! All the characters are fussing and seemingly in a hurry to get as much text as possible with the same intonations, all with a tear, not thoughtfully. I love your theater, and this performance is my first disappointment, but, I will not hide, great.

“ Kutepova likes it very much

“ Bravo! Full of delight! The work of actors, director, script, visualization, music, everything is complete and worked! Thank you very much! Have been with you for the first time and will definitely return!

“ The performance is extremely weak, just a kind of visualization (and in some cases not always successful) Parfenova "The other day." In comparison with other things the theater Fomenko - a complete failure. We regret that they did not leave after the first separation.

“ I love the theater of Fomenko and all actors without exception. For me it is a standard theater, not having similar, sensual and powerful. But this production, unfortunately, disappointed. The work and the forces invested in the creation of the play are invaluable and ... unjustified. The play is some kind of undercooked porridge. And the performance was dry and amateur. Of course, it's easier to criticize than do something yourself, but from Evgeny Tsyganov a good director (so far!) Did not work. I hope that his next production will be more successful and brighter. Thank you for the opportunity to see Ekaterina Vasilyeva on stage! Sincerely.

“ Great performance! Perfectly recreated the atmosphere of time and against this background a saga about the history of one family is displayed.