Philosophy for improving digestion.
Somewhere there are torrential rains, but in Koenigsberg, the weather is fine. In general, everything is fine, except for one strange thing: the birds do not fly away, and the apples do not fall. Something is really wrong here.
A good topic for a good dinner. As well as, for example, why fly balloons, or why chairs stagger.
How strange that the clock in this room resolutely refuses to tick.
And lunch is a good reason to gather with friends and develop a philosophy. Quietly and slowly. They generally do not hurry. Table talk for them is almost a religious ritual.
Words, words, words ... that's all in all, what they left us. But is it so little?
So it is not enough to understand what's what, where, where, where and why, what really is, and what a dream. Is it not enough to disrupt the human soul in small pieces and lay it down on the shelves?
Everything would go as usual, if there was no ringing at the door ... A beautiful young girl disappeared as quickly as she appeared.
Philosophers have an answer for everything. Except one - who is this girl and why did she come? Getting an autograph was just an excuse for something else ...
The golden autumn will one day end. And on the ground from the trees fall thousands of apples.
“ 10/30/2018 with friends - theatergoers visited the play "Kant" in the Theater. V. Mayakovsky. From the one you like: the organization of the stage and the auditorium is interesting - the arena and the university audience at the same time (such a solution to theatrical space with the addition of playgrounds at any point of the auditorium is practiced by our favorite theater "Sphere"), excellent actors who can play the phone book. Unfortunately, they did not even have to play it, but the play chosen by the director M. Karbauskas by his compatriot M. Ivashkyavichus - an indigestible something with a claim to intellectual elitism. Impossible prolonged performance, more than three hours of talk about anything, repeated replicas of replicas and stage settings. Humor is not thin, jokes are not funny, some are frankly vulgar. Paraphrasing the author, we can say that the work is very meager, and not only in terms of time and space. Waiting for at least some climax and decoupling of a languid plot remained for the second action. As a result, the spectators, who left the theater during the intermission, were jealous. It is a pity that respected actors are wasting talent in such a mediocre play. Sorry for the money spent and lost time. Such is the attempt with unfit means ...
“ Perhaps this performance is not for everyone. In our opinion, this is the best that we have seen in the theater in recent years. For the present they never went to any other production for the second time (although they looked at many worthy things and thought to come again). On the "Kant" go for the third time and something suggests that it will not be the last.
“ Kant was brought by a friend (she was for the company) because after reading about the play she decided that he would not be interesting to me. BUT I was very, very much mistaken. After watching, probably for a week, emotions filled up, which words can not convey. The entire production was held in one breath ... I advise everyone to attend this performance.
“ The performance looks in one breath, three hours fly by not noticeable. It would seem Kant, philosophy, all this can be boring. However, these are living people with living reactions. There are no topical jokes, but there is humor for all time, there are normal human feelings. The interesting location of the stage is in the middle, and the audience is sitting around. The play is to be watched more than once, and each time it will be opened by other faces. Many thanks)
“ Six men and one woman talk for three hours about a man. About how he thinks, how he loves, how he distinguishes between good and evil, how the imagination works, how real and imaginary time relates, and finally about the main thing - what is his goal. In passing, the conversation absorbs and digests two sisters of mercy, a servant in search of a new master and several imaginary and real, but missing characters. The classical Aristotelian play, as I understand it, everything happens in one place and in one piece of time. At the same time, this performance has everything to delight and capture completely, if in principle you at least like the theater a little, it is alive, it is funny and dramatic, it is tense and romantic, it is light and intelligent. Grotesque, absurdity, games with space and time, costumed historical drama, all together and at the same time. I can not say how good the artists were, I'm not an expert at all. But apparently they were beautiful, because the strongest and most immediate feeling, from which I still did not completely get rid of, left after everything ended - why? Why did not they open the book and see what's inside? It is clear that after all that happened in this book there must have been answers. Maybe they would still find out what the goal of man is after all.
“ Elegant performance! An inexpressible mix of sparkling jokes, the mystery of the old Koenigsberg, philosophical fabrications and all this in a chic actor's performance! Bravo!!!
“ Natalia and Viktor were on December 19. HIGHLY!!! liked!!! Thanks to all the actors! A great game, there is something to think about and laugh at. I really want to see again what we will do. We gladly tell and recommend to all our friends! (They themselves also got to the play on the recommendation of friends). And thanks to Bigbilet for the tickets !!! Happy New Year!
“ It's delicious, I'm going to repeat it.
“ I liked it very much! Thank you!
“ A delightful performance, with pleasure once again go to this performance! Such subtle things are worth revising.
“ Many thanks for the performance! Such a pleasure from the play, from the play of actors! And this performance, adult and for adults. With a touch of nostalgia. Very light! Very warm!
“ A unique performance!
“ I liked it very much.
“ It was with great pleasure that we went to dinner at Kant's, near the remarkable actors. I want to thank all the creators of the performance for the wonderful evening spent in the wonderful company, on an amazing scene. Here, all boundaries are blurred, and you are immersed in that long-deceased world.
“ "Kant" - a masterpiece! A matchless game of all actors. The amazing incarnation of Julia Solomatina in the foreigner Fobi Green. I applaud Mikhail Filippov
“ The play really liked
“ Thank you very much for the wonderful performance! We got pleasure and good mood from talented actors!
“ Great 'thank you very much'
“ We really enjoyed. Filippov, Kostolevsky and Nemoliaev are incomparable !!! True, against their background young young ladies look very weak. But let them learn !!! Thank you for the performance!
“ This is a performance for people with a high level of intelligence
“ Sumptuously! Thank you
“ A worthy gift to Kant on the day of his 290th birthday. Thanks to the actors and all the creators of the play.
“ Many thanks . The play "Kant" really liked. The actors' game is excellent. We received great pleasure.
“ Many thanks, the performance is wonderful!
“ The sheer disappointment. The lack of video and action, stupid dialogues, the choice of actors could be absolutely anything, all the characters are equally dim. Sitting in this red design could only be on the lap of a neighbor, when selling tickets, you have to moderate the desire to earn money slightly. With the wish of the play and the theater of development Svetlana Ragrina, philologist.
“ The fact that the Mayakovsky Theater is looking for new forms, no doubt. Watching the cooperation of the long-established repertory troupe (in my opinion, the best in Moscow) and free until recently, the director is always interesting. Any premiere is an event. In the program of the new play there is no concept of "scenography", there is "space". Because this time Sergei Barkhin put on the stage a huge red hexagon. We pass through an empty auditorium, climb the stage and go inside. There, along the perimeter, four rows of benches - one hundred and sixty-two spectator seats, and a small space in the middle. Before us at a round table, Immanuel Kant and his companions will dine. This is perceived very strongly. Thanks to Sergei Barkhin you can feel yourself as a part of the Mayakovsky Theater, and part of Kant's dinner. These feelings give a half-empty foyer, the fact of being on the great stage, getting into the common space with the play. Of course, my feelings greatly strengthened the fact that I was at the pre-premiere show. On this day there were many theatrical public, who greeted each other, communicated and were keenly interested in what was happening. In the "hall" opposite, Nikolai Tsiskaridze was sitting with the lady, on the left - Alexander Lazarev and his wife. As if I went another small step deep into the world Theater. *** I read that the play by Marius Ivashkevičius was specially adapted for this production into Russian. In the program there is a leaflet - the foreword of the author with the title "How to understand this". As far as I know, real stage works should not need such explanations, but, in any case, here they are needed. Of course, I can imagine Koenigsberg and East Prussia, but since there are no allusions to the volcano in Iceland, the theme of the fog from which people turn gray will remain gibberish for me. But not all viewers are playing the program, and even those who bought do not always read the tabs ... Perhaps, such a role, from the author, should have sounded in the play? The genre of the play is not indicated. Before the viewer - one day, more precisely, one dinner from the life of the philosopher. Almost the usual, with the usual friends, for unhurried conversations, a lunch intended for rest, where there is no place to work. Only one thing distinguishes him from the others - on this day they were joined by the niece of a friend of Kant who came from Scotland, and she wants the owner of the house to sign her recently published book ... Genre, it is really difficult to define. I have not seen such performances for a long time. Definitely, there is a kind of philosophy. Sometimes, maybe even superfluous. Definitely, there is a lot of humor. Probably, this is basically a comedy. But this is not an entertaining comedy at all, and the audience should not be altogether entertaining. Maybe it's a "slow comedy with elements of philosophy." Yes, that's probably the most accurate way.
“ Super! So intelligent, I even wanted to re-read the criticism of pure reason! Well spent time, thank you!
“ A wonderful play, an extraordinary play. Stunning play of actors. Thank you!
“ Gosspodi, Gosspodi, how good it is!
“ The legendary theater itself is worth visiting (even if only visiting the buffet). "Kant" is a performance-machine of Time, immersion in the atmosphere of the past, the century of the famous philosopher. And also thinking about "Is not the retinue playing the King?"
“ Very lively, spectacular performance. The whole performance does not leave the feeling that you yourself are present among the guests of Kant and participate in conversations with these people, you feel the same as they are. Unusual situation allows you to feel yourself immersed in another era and penetrate into life, the philosophy of these people, to feel and understand the course of their thoughts and humor. Talk about "Kant" is difficult, because it is difficult to describe the words of feelings that you experience. Better, as they say, once to see!
“ A wonderful performance!
“ It is delightful and excellent! BRAVO!!!