Нечистая сила16+
Photos
FeedBacks
“ What the director wanted to say, giving out roles to actors who are many times older than their characters is a big mystery. The spectacle, when married to Nicholas II, instead of 22-year-old Alix, comes out 50-year old woman - unforgettable. It is so deeply imbued with the atmosphere of severe schizophrenia that only one scene is worth attending to this spectacle. On the king's wife, schizophrenia does not stop, the old people playing pretty young grand dukes - there too ... Unfortunately, unfortunately, they play badly, cardboard, in one screamingly pathetic tone. Tear in the non-stop mode for 3 hours in a row, the characters talk with a cry - so most of the dialogues carry a sense of falsehood. But (this is about good)! On this sad background, a writer brilliantly performed by Perov, very talented, with a wonderful intonational range reading author's text and "leading" this performance, looks very advantageous. And most importantly, for what exactly is it worth to go to the play (well, except for the old lady in the role of a girl, of course) - this is a great set design! Here it is serious - everything is done great, masterful, expensive. The performance is made in the form of reading a novel by a writer (here we were lucky, since Perova is a great performer). Made in a clip-style manner - the action is divided into dozens of small scenes (from a few seconds to several minutes), organically woven into the thread of the story. This manner of giving does not allow the viewer to get bored, attention constantly switches from the narrator to the actors. with actors on the back screen, which displays video, historical or, more often, with the same actors, but stylized under the video of the early 20th century. It redeems everything and makes a three-hour play with bad actors interesting and boring. As for the most told story about Rasputin and the royal family - I did not read Pikul to my shame, so I do not know to whom to address the claims. Who on the spot of Rasputin drew some small merchant, why did Nicholas make a scrap, etc. etc. The shown story with reality has little in common, but one can not get irritated about this and just take it as a fairy tale variation on Rasputin's theme.
“ The play was liked, a good play of actors (tried very hard). Subjective reading of Pikul. Although Pikul himself was very subjective in his assessments.
Give feedBack
Tickets
Invite friends
Related events
Based on thousands of feedbacks, Teatronet defined events that are "close in spirit to the times and tastes"
by the way!!
According to statistics and audience who have bought a ticket for«Нечистая сила», we recommend to see
“ What the director wanted to say, giving out roles to actors who are many times older than their characters is a big mystery. The spectacle, when married to Nicholas II, instead of 22-year-old Alix, comes out 50-year old woman - unforgettable. It is so deeply imbued with the atmosphere of severe schizophrenia that only one scene is worth attending to this spectacle. On the king's wife, schizophrenia does not stop, the old people playing pretty young grand dukes - there too ... Unfortunately, unfortunately, they play badly, cardboard, in one screamingly pathetic tone. Tear in the non-stop mode for 3 hours in a row, the characters talk with a cry - so most of the dialogues carry a sense of falsehood. But (this is about good)! On this sad background, a writer brilliantly performed by Perov, very talented, with a wonderful intonational range reading author's text and "leading" this performance, looks very advantageous. And most importantly, for what exactly is it worth to go to the play (well, except for the old lady in the role of a girl, of course) - this is a great set design! Here it is serious - everything is done great, masterful, expensive. The performance is made in the form of reading a novel by a writer (here we were lucky, since Perova is a great performer). Made in a clip-style manner - the action is divided into dozens of small scenes (from a few seconds to several minutes), organically woven into the thread of the story. This manner of giving does not allow the viewer to get bored, attention constantly switches from the narrator to the actors. with actors on the back screen, which displays video, historical or, more often, with the same actors, but stylized under the video of the early 20th century. It redeems everything and makes a three-hour play with bad actors interesting and boring. As for the most told story about Rasputin and the royal family - I did not read Pikul to my shame, so I do not know to whom to address the claims. Who on the spot of Rasputin drew some small merchant, why did Nicholas make a scrap, etc. etc. The shown story with reality has little in common, but one can not get irritated about this and just take it as a fairy tale variation on Rasputin's theme.
“ The play was liked, a good play of actors (tried very hard). Subjective reading of Pikul. Although Pikul himself was very subjective in his assessments.